Do you believe that there is a new gap created in this? I go to the amendment that we're discussing right now, which talks about dwelling-houses. It specifically says that there should be an “ex parte application by the Minister”. In response to that, “a judge” would be able to “issue a warrant authorizing an officer to enter a dwelling-house”.
Now, I realize your view that “dwelling-house” was not.... I understand why that was not contemplated in the initial legislation here, but do you believe that there is a gap in this, in not including warrant language and the requirement for a warrant under these authorities with respect to warehouse and transport operators?
Should we be looking at warrants there? That's basically the question.