My colleague is bringing up many points for discussion, but I feel that he's going beyond the scope of my amendment. He isn't a regular member of this committee, so he didn't have the privilege of hearing the Privacy Commissioner's testimony. He strongly encouraged us to propose this amendment.
Perhaps by speaking slowly, I can make him understand that my amendment seeks to specify what a dwelling-house is, how an officer may enter such a place and under what circumstances they may do so, depending on whether they have a warrant. My amendment does a good job of answering the commissioner's questions.