It's my understanding that, if the amendment were to pass, there would be a certain amount of additional work that the CBSA would need to undertake in order to access goods that are contained in a dwelling-house.
As previously testified, we haven't thought of a scenario where that would necessarily be the case, but in the unlikely event that one were to occur, we would need to go through that process in order to get judicial authorization to enter the dwelling-house. That would take the time that it would take, and there would be a cascading impact down in terms of other CBSA availability.