Just to make sure I don't sound as irritating as I can be, we are following the clause-by-clause process. After a clause is voted upon, I introduce necessarily the next clause unless there is a point of order, which may be relevant, but a point of order doesn't allow any MP to introduce a motion.
If I don't follow the procedural order that is appropriate, MPs are free to mention that through a point of order, but we're going to go through clause-by-clause until we have finished the 138 clauses and whatever amendments and subamendments there may be.
That brings us back to clause 3.
Are there any members who wish to speak to this?
Seeing none, we will now vote on clause 3. I invite the clerk to proceed with a recorded vote.
(Clause 3 agreed to: yeas 9; nays 0)
(On clause 4)
