Thank you, Mr. Chair.
This is what we have discussed. I want to be abundantly transparent. I invite any of my colleagues, from other parties or my own party, to chime in if I misstate anything. This is what I would propose. I propose that we vote on CPC-2. If CPC-2 passes, the officials have advised us that there will be situations of exigency, which is the term I've used, when judicial authorization is impracticable to obtain. In other words, there's no time to obtain that. That is my understanding of their recommendation. What we would then do is that I would ask that the drafters draft an amendment to that effect. We would then consider that amendment as part of new proposed section 15.201—perhaps new proposed subsections 15.201(3) and 15.201(4), if necessary—and vote on that amendment in the future.
Right now, though, we are voting on CPC-2. If it passes, we would give instruction for a draft on what I call exigency. Then everybody can deal with what they need.
Am I clear? In other words, I think we should vote on CPC-2 now and then give the instructions.