Unfortunately, I am against that amendment.
One reason is that this amendment, to my understanding, attempts to clarify that “telecommunications system” does not include the actual content of information being sent and that secret orders cannot interfere with lawful expression. The experts are here as well. There's a technical danger behind this amendment if it goes through. This is highly problematic, because the definition of “content” is technically ambiguous. In a cybersecurity context, the technical signalling information, which is vital for monitoring system health, could be legally interpreted as content.
Furthermore, malicious code, such as malware or computer worms, is technically part of the data content and we cannot separate these two. If the government is prohibited from regulating anything classified as content, it will be legally powerless to stop these technical threats from moving through the systems.