Thank you, Mr. Caputo.
Before discussing this amendment, I would like to make a comment.
If amendment CPC‑3 were adopted, the subsequent amendment BQ‑1 could no longer be moved because of what we call a line conflict. In House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Fourth Edition, which we know well, section 16.71 states that “the committee Chair calls the proposed amendments in the order in which they would appear in the bill”, meaning based on the lines. “Once a line of a clause has been amended by the committee, it cannot be further amended by a subsequent amendment as a given line may be amended only once.”
In other words, remember that the adoption of this amendment would mean that a subsequent amendment, BQ‑1, could no longer be moved because of a line conflict.
Mr. Ramsay, you have the floor.