Given that CPC-5 was carried, for G-1, while there is not a line conflict, there is at minimum a tension between them. G-1 is probably unnecessary in this context because there's already the judicial authorization piece with different criteria. That was carried as part of CPC-5.
Technically speaking, factors that the GIC would consider in recommending or suggesting that an order be confidential don't need to be the same thick criteria that a judge would consider in approving it, and there is overlap in those considerations. G-1 was more of an alternative to CPC-5, even if there's not a line conflict.