We are against this amendment.
We think that this will greatly limit the ability to intervene in behaviours that are legal but could nonetheless put the telecommunications system at risk. The purpose of the bill is to minimize the risks to the telecommunications system, not to determine whether behaviours are legal or not. We're talking about risks to the telecommunications system. These could include network configuration practices that are deficient or negligent. These are not necessarily illegal behaviours, but they are still dangerous for the telecommunications system.
I'd like the expert, Mr. Arbour, to comment on that.