I think there are two things. One is that we have to look at major container volumes that are going to come off the lines, and then there are add-on volumes, as I mentioned in my opening remarks, which are usually on other types of ships—smaller ships.
The ones on the major lines are more like scheduled clockwork rotations. The other vessels have a wider span of arrival times, and therefore you need that flexibility. Having the ability to take in vessels in some other ports will allow those major ports to become very efficient and reduce dwell times.
I was in the U.S. this week. The port of Long Beach in California turns trucks inside of 40 minutes. The delays, I guarantee you, are not that on our side of the border. If we help the larger ports in not having to deal with [Inaudible—Editor] on other volumes, then we would bring that fluidity faster.
For Contrecœur, of course, there's been a lot of work to be able to take in larger ships, but that doesn't make the depth of the St. Lawrence any deeper. That's why the Port of Quebec's project is to lighten up and top off these types of volumes and then to support that type of growth as well.