No, I wouldn't, and I wouldn't in two respects.
First, the consistent claim that this data is of low privacy value, I think, is simply inaccurate. We just heard examples from Professor Diab and, perhaps, over the course of the next little bit, we'll have a chance to walk through some of those kinds of examples, but it seems to me that, even with the question that came up towards the very end of your last panel about whether or not someone might know that you asked Siri something, the question isn't the content. The fact is that you raised it and engaged with people. The fact is that members of the public engage with you, and a record would exist of who you communicate with. The fact that there might be orders to have that kind of thing disclosed raises, from my perspective, significant issues.
This may have significant privacy import, so lowering the standard for this information, when there is scant evidence that the higher standard that we've had in place for many years now has posed a problem, seems to me unwarranted.
