I don't have a good answer for why they did it or why they didn't address those issues, but I will say that I think it raises real concerns.
If the reason is that they don't believe that issues around, let's say, mandatory metadata retention raise charter issues, so they felt there was no need to include it, I think that is both inaccurate as a matter of law and that it also suggests, as we've been saying, that this legislation is going to be challenged quickly. I think there is a real risk that provisions like that will be struck down.