I understand that. I understand that both Apple and Google are largely supportive of the idea but have objections to specific provisions of the bill. I just wanted to establish whether you have ever seen a bill that you didn't have objections to some portions of.
I think people are overstating some of the objections. I don't disagree with some of the objections you raised, but I don't think some of the claims that are being made—for example, surveillance equipment that could be installed in devices and forcing companies, even under orders, to put in surveillance equipment—are reasonable or logical. I don't think they bear out in the wording of the bill.
What I'm asking is this: Have you guys ever gone before a committee or made a submission in the U.K., in Australia or in the U.S. and said, “Wow, we think this bill is great”?