Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Mr. Nadeau, my questions are along the same lines as the parliamentary secretary's, so I'm going to continue the discussion with Mr. Marchand.
Basically, if I understand correctly, the “reasonable grounds to suspect” threshold in Bill C‑22 applies to specific data that aren't considered sensitive.
You are arguing the opposite. The Minister of Justice, the justice department and department officials are saying this respects the Supreme Court's decision, but you don't seem to agree.
Can you elaborate on why you think that, to help us really understand your point?