Thank you.
Maybe this is a question for Mr. Van Laer, but it's also for Commissioner Carrique.
In talking to the integrated child exploitation teams in Alberta in the wake of the Bykovets Supreme Court decision, it became a nightmare to write warrants and production orders. If we don't know if there's a reasonable expectation of privacy around IP addresses, it seems to me that part 1 actually provides the appropriate remedy to allow law enforcement to speed up their ability to get these warrants written so that they can go after the telecom or ESPs that have the information.
Is that correct? Is part 1 largely what's needed to speed up these investigations, Commissioner?