I'm happy to have some of that conversation, but we would have to be here much longer than six minutes in order for me to do that.
The reality is that if we look at the legislation surrounding lawful access, the last time there was a substantial update was prior to the development of Google. If you imagine us operating right now, very simply put, we are delayed in our ability to secure information. We are not as effective as we could be, and we are certainly not as effective as some of the other Five Eyes countries are. We are hamstrung by outdated legislation, and it needs to evolve.
It is virtually the foundation of every complex investigation we complete. Normally, it begins with a production order and may result in a number of other different judicial authorizations, but we're receiving them slower than we should and not with the level of detail that we should have in order to accomplish the roles we've been provided. It's a difficult spot to be in.
I'll give you an example. If we were to watch an extortion happen in Peel, and the investigators go out, do their investigation and identify a corner store that captured that extortion on video, with the person speaking on a cellular telephone, we may write a production order for that tower site. The results of that production order, in some jurisdictions, could take up to 30, 45 or 50 days. In that time, we've lost evidence. We've lost the opportunity to prevent additional crimes. It doesn't happen all the time, but that's one of the big issues that we are dealing with.
There's an opportunity to be more effective and more efficient in our investigations through enhancements to the legislation surrounding lawful access.