Along those lines, would you agree....?
This is an exercise in comparative legislation and drafting. One of the deficiencies I think we've had in this committee process is that we haven't heard from experts on EU law or on Australian law, where they keep metadata for even longer but I don't know exactly what categories of metadata they're keeping. Do you see it as a deficiency in this study when we don't actually have people from other jurisdictions, which is something that we heard about from the committee process?
Would it concern you, as an outside observer, that this committee isn't looking at other models and hasn't heard from witnesses who are experts on other models so that we can compare them in order to get the best possible outcome?