I am very pleased to hear that.
One of the witnesses from the Barreau du Québec even seemed to claim that with an IP address, one could access our dreams. That’s a bit of a stretch. It’s a bit of nonsense. The IP address remains basic information that will allow police, with a warrant, to go and get the information they need.
The other point we discussed is the famous three-month period, which might be insufficient. What I gathered from all three of your testimonies is that investigations often begin after crimes have already been committed, and we can’t know in advance what information we’ll need. So, we can’t say we’ll just keep a specific piece of information because that’s all we’ll need. That’s not how it works.
Mr. Van Laer, what are your thoughts on this?