My third question concerns the reason to “believe” as opposed to the reason to “suspect”.
It is clear that, in this case, we are talking about a reason to suspect someone, because we are seeking information that will not serve as evidence per se. An IP address, or a telemetric address, is not evidence to charge someone or find them guilty. So that is why the legislature wanted a significant and recognized legal standard, which is the reason to “suspect” rather than the reason to “believe.”
Commissioner Carrique, what do you have to say about this?