The issue Mr. Smith just raised about compensation came up, and it's reflected in the bill as regards non-core providers explicitly. “Appropriate” compensation are the words used. With regard to the core providers, it's left open. That's something that might well be considered.
I've said elsewhere that metadata wasn't the subject of a great deal of our concern. Data preservation was obviously an important feature, but we didn't delve into that in great detail.
Those would be the two that come to mind.