Good. Thank you.
I have another related question. We are being told that this new arrangement of lawful access is needed because of investigations and other kinds of necessity. I get that, but on the other hand, how can we prevent these kinds of measures from being seen as necessary?
At the end, they become measures of convenience because we're talking about two concepts: reasonable suspicion or reasonable grounds to believe. There's a difference there, and I would say the threshold for the first one, grounds to suspect, is lower, much lower than the grounds to believe.
Where would one begin and end? I would suspect that there would be grey areas in between. In that kind of situation, how can we be sure that this will not become a measure of convenience for the police to abuse, if I can use that word, in order to obtain personal information?