Okay. I'm sorry; I was thinking about something else. I'll move on from that.
What I'd really like to know about is end-to-end encryption. We all know what that means. A number of companies use encrypted technology. Let's say it's Apple Health or something like that. We could agree that's very personal information that would be contained on your smart phone about your health. I don't think anybody's going to dispute that. It attracts a high expectation of privacy. Let's say that's encrypted. That's different from end-to-end encryption. A company like Signal offers a service that goes from one end to another and nobody can break it. That's end-to-end encryption.
What about when data is encrypted as part of the program? If Apple has the key to that encryption, would they not be required to track that data as part of this bill?