I would echo that broadly. Again, I don't know what precisely it takes for parliamentarians to achieve what they need to achieve, but my sense in reviewing the bill is that it's about the sheer scope of words. I'm speaking as a former English major now, but it's about the number of words. I mean this in not too cute a way, but there are many verbs in this bill—“use”, “access”, “take”—and these are not trivial words. They are extraordinarily broad. They just are.
It's been quite a task to review this bill. I've had to review it countless times, at this point, and at no point have my worries been assuaged. I think much more time is needed just to go through some of these basic definitions.