Thank you very much.
One question I have is this. The government has called this bill “encryption-neutral”, whatever that means. I have no idea what that means. I think it's a little bit of a cute phrase to try to avoid the question. The minister himself has said that they will deal with encryption.
Is it even possible to have any amendment that might satisfy you, given how this process has gone? I'm sure you've been observing it. I'm sure you've seen the rushed nature of this process. The fact of the matter is that we probably need more time on this bill. It's not that we haven't spent substantial time. It's that we've crammed so many witnesses into a short period of time that I don't really feel that we heard adequately from witnesses.
Number one, would you agree with all of that? Number two, is there anything that could possibly satisfy you with respect to part 2 on your encryption concerns?