I believe it is a point of order because this is a different subject matter completely.
We have learned—and I don't want to be disappointed here—more information during this meeting, which required a new point of privilege. In the previous meeting, we did not have amendments due in this meeting. This is a different scenario. We learned of more things we have missed, and we haven't received.
I would argue that it is absolutely a different point of privilege. I would completely disagree with your ruling if you were to rule that it wasn't. I think you need to see that this is a new set of information that we have not received. It's totally different from Mr. Lloyd's.
