That's fair. Again, it seems to me that your name is more important than your pseudonym, so I don't understand that whole part.
The second part of this seems to be to remove the words “the types of services provided” and “the period during which the services were provided”. Again, if I were to go to that photo store, I wouldn't be able to find out, at this lower threshold, whether or not she had photos developed. That's the whole amendment.
I'm not really understanding why a pseudonym, the types of services I provided or the period during which the services were provided somehow carry higher privacy rights than the other enumerated parts of this section, where we describe and explain what subscriber information is.
I guess my point is that I'm voting no. My other point is that I don't understand how this is so complex. I think I was able to boil it down into two parts in about seven seconds.
Thank you.