Actually, I was curious about something. Certainly, in my opinion, the Barreau du Québec is a good reference. After all, they're respected lawyers, particularly those who draft briefs.
What I find unfortunate is that we heard from the Canadian Bar Association, but we did not receive its brief or its proposed amendments. That's because there seem to be translation problems.
Therefore, I'm not sure what's going on. Was the Canadian Bar Association included in your consultations? I understand that you did not consult the Barreau du Québec, but was the Canadian Bar Association included in your consultations? I'm a bit surprised by what you're telling me.
What I understand is that the amendment would not change much. The parliamentary secretary said that the process should be able to be carried out in real time and that adopting my amendment would be very serious, yet you downplayed that. I believe you said that the amendment would not change much. That is my understanding.