That's interesting, because I always thought reasonable grounds to believe was not to the level of a prima facie case. For a prima facie case there is something there that you can get.
Maybe I'm just confused because this is a very technical area of law. When I think of something, it's that you have reasonable grounds to believe that an offence has been committed, and is that reasonable?
Mr. Wong, if I take your point, we're talking about “Has something happened? Yes, it may have happened.” I suppose that's a bit inconsistent with my understanding, but I might be out to lunch on this.
Thank you very much.