Thank you.
First of all, I'm a total nerd, especially on this subject. I'm going to give you one of my real-life examples, and we'll see if I'm getting this.
What we're talking about here is what is specifically on the system versus what is accessible to the system. Is that accurate? Okay.
One of the first cases of Internet luring that I dealt with was a very disgusting individual who was luring children from the Philippines. He was arrested for more substantive charges. Initially, it was a child sexual abuse material investigation. The RCMP got his hard drive and realized that, whoa, he was actually arranging offences in the Philippines. He was then arrested on that offence.
In the search incidental to the arrest, a cellphone was recovered, which was contrary to his condition on the original charge that he not possess any electronic devices. The RCMP did a data extraction, with a warrant. Within that data extraction were all sorts of Facebook communications.
Am I right to say that those Facebook communications would not be in the phone per se, but accessible to the phone? Is this the type of thing we're dealing with?