Right. My point is that within our devices we probably don't even realize what's there, most of us. For instance, I was just looking up an investment. I won't get into the details of things, but if it looks at my face and says my password is good, it can then access what's on that website. Is the current practice now to say that by having your device, we have access to what your device allows us to get to? In other words, that investment portfolio is password-protected. We get your password, which now gets us in there, but we have a judicial authorization, as in, a judge has said there are reasonable grounds to believe an offence has been committed and that there's evidence to be found in that place.
Is that where it gets us? I hope I'm being clear here.