To answer and to add on to Madame DeBellefeuille's question, what my colleague was expressing is that the subscriber tool is judicially authorized by a court that balances both privacy interests and law enforcement interests. It's law enforcement versus privacy interest neutral, and it would apply to everyone. That is a really important point—to remember that this is a judicially authorized warrant for basic information like name and address.
As it relates to medical information, that provision doesn't speak to providing any content of anybody's service information, no medical information. Again, it's name and address.
In terms of the tool itself, it is a tool for law enforcement to investigate crime. Again, it's judicially authorized, so it has to balance those privacy interests. It's pretty straightforward. It would be everybody who provides a service. If a law firm is providing a service, a car rental, like my colleague identified, or any sort of service provider, law enforcement can go get a judicial authorization to ask the court for a court order to provide somebody's name and address.