I think part of the issue with the amendment is that it really does not have any legal effect. Because of the way it's articulated in the motion, it's including these conditions, so it's non-exhaustive. These are just examples of conditions that a judge might be able to impose. I don't think it narrows it. It does nothing exactly to the scope of the conditions that might be able to be applied.
There is a risk that these conditions become commonplace because they're articulated and in the law itself.