Thank you for that. I'm just going to say one thing, and I think the RCMP will be able to supplement.
Putting aside the conversation about how difficult or not amending legislation can be—because that can vary, depending on the circumstances—it's not really for us to say and it's not our role to pass legislation.
We have talked about future-proofing. Part of the reason that “subscriber information” or other parts of the legislation are worded the way they are is that technology is changing fast. What might be a way of identifying a subscriber today—name, address, email and phone number—is relevant today and works today, but if it were an exclusive list, that might limit police in identifying a suspect in a specific crime during the course of an investigation, even when there were other ways of identifying the person.
That can be a limiting factor in real time because technology changes so quickly. There are probably even things that exist today in technology that speak to identifying subscriber information that aren't listed here. There's a real on-the-ground impact, and the RCMP can speak to that, but things evolve so quickly that even if you were doing legislation super quickly, it could have real impacts on real investigations.