Mr. Chair, I have a point of order.
The past practice of the committee on a bill from 2013 does not relate to the question of whether we should have an inclusive list or a non-inclusive list. It doesn't relate to the subamendment.
If we follow the practice of the House, he needs to speak to the subamendment that he's put forward, not to a general framework that could be used to talk to every single amendment and subamendment repeatedly throughout the entire clause-by-clause.
I do not believe he's being relevant. I would ask you, Mr. Chair, to bring him back to order.