Boy, I had a really good thought going there.
Section 495 of the code, as I recall, governs reasonable and probable grounds to make an arrest, and that is based on “reasonable grounds to believe”, as I understand it. Is there any connection between the powers of arrest versus the reasonable and probable grounds to believe? In other words, are they on the same standard?
Would section 495 operate on the same standard as “reasonable grounds to believe” if we were to adopt this amendment? I suppose that is a better way to put it.