Okay. Therein is my point. “Reasonable grounds to believe” in the context of section 495 is below a prima facie case. That's a fairly low threshold, in my view. It's above a hunch and above “reasonable grounds to suspect”, but if we're articulating it as below a prima facie case under section 495, would it not be below a prima facie case under proposed section 487.0121?
I hope I'm not getting too technical, but that's my point. I'm trying to deduce exactly what the threshold of “reasonable grounds to believe” actually means.