This is helpful. I feel a bit outgunned here, but I'm trying my best.
I'll put one case to you, Rodgers, in which the court said, “Since individuals have different expectations of privacy in different contexts and with regard to different kinds of information and documents, it follows that the standard of review of what is “reasonable” in a given context must be flexible”.
Putting that over the broader framework of different categories of privacy interests, the “biographical core”—I think that is one of the phrases the court has used—of personal information can reveal their choices, their habits and their lifestyles. Tell me if I'm wrong here, because I'm not—