That's fair. Let me bring it back.
The reason this discussion is important is that by simply saying “the types of services provided”, as we are here, we elicit, as Ms. Gibner correctly stated, the common-sense reaction that those are services provided by the telco. However, it's not limited to that, because we know, as we just established, that these proposed subparagraphs are non-exhaustive illustrative lists.
It's not just about the information that the telco has on you. It could be, for example—and I'll put it to you—a service related to hotels or an escort service that someone might have engaged. I suspect that would be different from saying, “Telco, do you provide them services?”
I don't know whether the RCMP or CSIS has any colour they want to add to your point. My point is that this being non-exhaustive leaves it open such that some of the information may have a lower expectation of privacy and for some it may be higher, and when we get to the discussion of the standard, that will also play a role there.
Mr. Burchill or Mr. Gilkes, go ahead.