Yes, it does. It confirms part of my discomfort with the current clause, which is that it's being left open-ended. The scope of subscriber information could potentially be quite broad; therefore, there could be different privacy interests at play. I don't think that's the best balance, I'll say, between providing law enforcement the right classes of information to identify what services we're providing and potentially going to the next step of getting the production order and protecting certain privacy interests that Canadians, in my view, reasonably have.
To summarize, that's why I think this subamendment to create an exhaustive list is necessary, and that's in keeping with the Privacy Commissioner's recommendation to narrow the list of subscriber information to a finite list.
Thank you, Ms. Gibner, Mr. Wong, Mr. Burchill, Mr. Gilkes and Mr. Nashef, for your comments.
I'll leave it there.