Thank you. That's helpful.
I thought you might go to the transmission one, because that's the one I'm aware of. I suspect that we will return to that in our discussion and debate on the different standards, because I think we may take a different view on what transmission data is versus what is being proposed in subscriber information.
One of the other points the Privacy Commissioner made with this list needs to be dealt with in the list before we get to the standard. If the standard is not changed, the Privacy Commissioner makes the argument that the problems with the definition will be magnified because other portions of part 1 rely on that definition. The Privacy Commissioner makes the argument that because the production order for subscriber information after you get the confirmation of service, which relies on the same definition, can be served on any person who provides service, that means that in some of the cases, service providers are going to be required to provide all—it refers to all—the information in the chapeau.
What do you say to the critique that this definition compounds the problem because the subsequent production order for subscriber information would then rely on the same definition, which is very expansive?