Does anyone from Public Safety want to add anything?
This again raises the standards issue. The example you've provided on the phone number and going from there—I'm only speaking for myself at this point—seems to make some sense.
The problem I see, especially with proposed paragraph 487.011(c) under the definition of “subscriber information”, is that it's contemplating a whole lot more stuff, including information that would go to the biographical core that the Supreme Court noted.
That's why I thought that clarifying the definition was important. We didn't do that, fine, but now we're on the standard. I want to get the standard correct, because if we're going to touch things more expansively than just looking at whose telephone number it is for the first confirmation of service—“Do you provide service to this telephone number?”—and then for the production order, both of which will have the same suspicion standard....
Do I have that right, Ms. Gibner?