Okay.
This raises another point I wanted to make in response to something Mr. Wong said. He made reference to the issue that in Canada, we don't have the same process other countries do. In fairness, I think you omitted mentioning the reason we have that difference, which is that we have the Constitution and the charter. These have been interpreted to establish privacy jurisprudence around section 8.
That's important context. I've heard again and again about Five Eyes, the G7 and the G20, but Australia doesn't have a charter. They don't have the same history of protection of privacy that we do. That's a fundamental difference. I would argue that common law would give you some of this too, but they haven't gone down that path.
I just want to make the point that I don't think I heard a fair apples-to-apples comparison. I'm not suggesting that I heard all of you make it, but to finish Mr. Wong's thought on the issue in Canada, I'll say there is a difference, and it's because we have the Constitution.
Ms. Gibner, I'll go back to my question.
It was a conscious choice. Why go for a lower standard?