We were talking about the two decisions earlier, Ms. Gibner: the Spencer decision and.... I don't think we talked about Bykovets, but Bykovets is the second important one. This goes to my question about what type of information is attracting what degree of privacy. Granted, there may be a bit of overlap here between the confirmation of service and the subscriber information. Bear with me there.
My understanding is that for Spencer, the Supreme Court said that subscriber information attracts a high degree of privacy because it connects a person's identity to their online activity. Is that a fair ratio for the judgment—at least one part of it?