Yes, it works.
The point I want to make here goes to the earlier question I asked you, Mr. Wong, about other places in the Criminal Code that use the suspicion standard. I would like you or Ms. Gibner to make the argument for me that for transmission data, tracking data and financial data—those are the three you noted that I was able to take down in time, the three of the four that are on the suspicion standard—there's an apples-to-apples comparison to the information on the confirmation of service.
I don't want to put words in your mouth, but what I'm understanding as one of the arguments is that in other places in the code, there's a lower standard—suspicion. As one of those places, let's take transmission data as the example. Transmission data is similar to basic confirmation under the first step of our investigation. Is that the position? If so, persuade me that's apples to apples.