That would be my view.
I would refer you to the Criminal Code, where a similar provision already exists. To situate you, part of the balance we're talking about when we say “privacy rights” and “law enforcement” is built into a Criminal Code that already exists. I would refer you to section 487.018, which is about financial data. It might assist the committee to review that provision, because it's along the same lines, MP Mantle, of what you're asking me. What sort of reasonable expectation of privacy do these things have? They list all sorts of information related to your finances that is accessible with the standard of “reasonable grounds to suspect”. You need a court order. You need to get it judicially authorized. The police need to have reasonable grounds to get that. That is the type of information that I would call subscriber information.
Again, I'm suggesting this to you because it's going to be you who has to decide. Financial information seems a bit more.... If we're comparing, you're trying to ask, “Is there a gradation, Kim, on kinds of information?” I would suggest that this is your marker.
I just wanted to point that out, if it assists you.