This isn't necessarily my view, but there's lots of legal literature out there on this.
In earlier hearings, when we appeared here after the bill was introduced, I believe you mentioned that “reasonable grounds to believe” is below “a balance of probabilities”. There are a lot of legal scholars who talk about that threshold. The top of the pyramid would be “beyond a reasonable doubt”. The civil standard “balance of probabilities” is somewhere in the middle, and the highest standard in the Criminal Code, for investigative purposes, is “reasonable grounds to believe”. It's somewhere below “a balance of probabilities”, but it's above “reasonable suspicion”.