I'll answer in English.
It's not a plus because currently police use the general production order. In other motions that are coming up for discussion, you're also proposing to raise the level of judicial scrutiny, the test for it. It goes counter to the objective of the bill, which is to provide police with timely access to data. This would, in fact, give them less than they're currently getting under a general production order.
The idea of the more precise tool is to give them information that is consistent, as Ms. Gibner said, with other information that's available under “reasonable suspicion” already in the Criminal Code that relates to subscriber information. Your amendment would give them less than they're currently getting, and even with your other proposed amendments, if it were to stay the same, it would give them less than they're currently getting.