CPC-3 varies slightly because it refers to subscriber information, whereas NDP-3 does not refer to subscriber information. It says, “that relates to a subscriber”. NDP-3 completely avoids the definition of “subscriber information”, whereas CPC-3 and BQ-4 refer to subscriber information. It's the tail end, and from a practical perspective, arguments can be made that it would still work out in the way it was designed to work out, but it is less clear.
The way it's spelled out in the bill is that it does provide the service provider with something to respond to, and that is the information that has been provided in the affidavit.