No. One is “reasonable suspicion” and one is “reasonable grounds to believe”.
The arrest without a warrant is a big power of the state to apprehend someone. What we're talking about here in clause 5 is the confirmation of service demand.
We've provided information to committee members before to the effect that, in every other country, they don't need this tool because service providers say “yes” or “no”, whether or not they have information. The issue in Canada is that we have service providers who require a court order any time they talk to the state.
The information is also “yes” or “no”, and this was changed from Bill C-2 to Bill C-22 after consultation. The impact on privacy and a person's rights is far less. In fact, it impacts a service provider just to confirm whether or not they provide service to a telephone number or an IP address. The standards are different.