As you noted in your first question, it's not for us to answer the question about whether or not part 1 is sufficient and say that if we get part 1, can we park part 2. That is not up for us to answer.
My first answer stands. Both parts address gaps in the system and are important for law enforcement and intelligence so that they can help further their investigations.
We've answered questions—and law enforcement were here separately from us—on the necessity of some metadata.
There are amendments, I understand, which are part of the proposals to be heard by this committee, that address some of the issues you just mentioned. I'm happy to answer questions about that to see what we can provide you with in terms of information and advice that can inform your decision.